
Blog
Majority of White Clergy Interviewed Report Feeling Compelled and Constrained to Address Racial Justice in Their Ministry
There's no one-size-fits-all approach to fighting injustice. This month, we look at the strategies used by White clergy who choose to address racial injustice in their communities and "walk the tightrope" between their personal and communal values.

Trends in Ministry Flourishing
Majority of White clergy interviewed report feeling compelled and constrained to address racial justice in their ministry.
To be a clergyperson can feel like being a tightrope walker.
At one end of the pole are your personal values, the values that very likely called you to ministry in the first place. At the other end of the pole are your communal values, the values you’ve learned along the way to attune to different ministry contexts and “meet people where they’re at.” Balancing the two poles is lifelong, often deeply formative work. It can also be deeply frustrating.
READ: Walking the Tightrope: How White United Methodist Clergy Approach Race and Racial Justice
For two-thirds of the White United Methodist Church (UMC) clergy we journeyed alongside between June 2020 and June 2023*, a period that followed the death of George Floyd, the popularization of the Black Lives Matter movement, and renewed participation in national demonstrations, racial injustice was not only something they lamented but also something they were taking concrete steps to address. Nearly all these clergy also reported feeling constrained in doing so, as they balanced their personal passion with mixed receptions from their mostly White congregants. “It leads me to have to kind of walk a tightrope in this area,” shared one pastor, “because I cannot alienate my entire congregation, or they will turn a deaf ear.”
(To learn more about our interviews with clergy of color during this same period, skip ahead to find our recommended Serve Well resource: Witnessing the Wounds.)
The barriers to social change in mainline Protestant churches are longstanding. Entrenched institutional norms, ideologically diverse congregations, and political misalignment with their congregations all present challenges for White clergy who want to center racial justice in their ministry settings. Yet many persist. In the National Survey of Religious Leaders, almost three quarters of White mainline Protestant clergy reported in 2019-2020 that they had engaged in political activism regarding race in their role as a congregational leader—a rate comparable to Black Protestant clergy. So, what strategies do they use—and how can denominational leaders help?
READ: Clergy Political Actions and Agenda: New Findings from the National Survey of Religious Leaders
Strategy #1: The Shepherding Approach
The most common approach taken by the White pastors who were addressing racial injustice in their ministry was what we call the shepherding approach, in which slow, careful nudging of congregants toward racial awareness was privileged over direct confrontation. “Shepherding is similar but not the same as being a prophet,” said one pastor. While prophets “speak hard truths,” shepherds follow and help apply those hard truths. Or, as another pastor put it, “I try to find the spot where I challenge people at a rate they can accept.”
Sometimes this approach looked like conscious-raising activities that engaged the whole congregation (like a sermon or book study), while other times racial injustice was strategically addressed with a small group of congregants—or in one-on-one conversations—first. While many pastors felt this pragmatic approach was necessary, it remained a source of tension, like “tiptoeing around things” or “walking on eggshells” for fear of losing congregants’ attention—or attendance.
Strategy #2: The Extra-Congregational Approach
To counterbalance the tension between their call and their context, several pastors engaged in more active racial justice work outside the boundaries of the church and/or separate from their church members (like attending a racial equity training or participating in a protest). One pastor explained his rationale for why he did not engage race directly in his own congregation: “I’m not sure if it’s cowardice or, just, I don’t think it would be fruitful” if the congregation wasn't going to engage in race discussions that were “brutally honest” and involved “self-examination”. So, he moved his racial justice work outside the congregation, noting, “In my own personal way, I’m trying to make a difference.”
Our data suggests that this approach can buoy pastors who otherwise feel constrained, but it also takes its toll. It often requires pastors to commit their time and energy outside their normal “working hours” and can still leave them feeling like they’re falling short of their values, calling, and pastoral responsibility. “Who am I supposed to be?” asked one pastor during a period of intense discernment that challenged, refined, and ultimately deepened his sense of call. “But,” the pastor added, “that was a very significant journey and had mental health implications.”

The tension between what these White clergy feel called to do and what they feel able to do in their congregations when it comes to issues of race appeared to be a source of significant stress. Because of this, our data underscores the importance of denominational leaders providing guidance on how to attend to racial injustice pastorally, even amidst the plethora of anti-racism resources. In our research, clergy serving in rural churches and those who were new to their appointments or early in their careers seemed to face the most constraints and therefore may be the most in need of support.
“Nobody’s free until everybody’s free,” said civil rights and faith leader Fannie Lou Hamer. Walking a tightrope may not feel like freedom. But perhaps there’s wisdom in slowing down long enough so everybody makes it to the other side.
*This study draws from a series of in-depth interviews with 50 UMC clergy serving congregations in North Carolina from 2020 to 2023. Forty-two of the participants were White, and of those participants 28, or two-thirds, reported that race and racial justice were salient and actionable issues to them. The other third either did not bring race up in their interviews or indicated it was not a resonant issue for them and/or their congregants.
Your Serve Well Resource
Witnessing the Wounds: BIPOC Clergy in the United Methodist Church Reflect on Their Callings, Careers, and Pastoral Experiences
Amid clergy burnout and civil unrest, a group of seventeen Black, Indigenous, and People of Color (BIPOC) clergy were asked questions regarding their call stories, ordination experiences, and careers in the North Carolina United Methodist Church. The result? A dynamic resource called Witnessing the Wounds that invites readers to sit with quotations from pastors of color and reflect on what was heard, what was learned, and what action was inspired. Consider gathering a group of ministry friends and shouldering the realities shared within the resource together.

About Us
The Collaborative is a partnership between the Duke Clergy Health Initiative (CHI) and Duke Religion and Social Change Lab (RaSCL). CHI focuses on providing pastors with tools to improve their physical, emotional, and spiritual health, while RaSCL focuses on helping current and future faith leaders adapt to evolving times. Together, we serve those who want to serve well. Our work is made possible thanks to the generous time of our clergy and seminarian ministry partners and generous funding from The Duke Endowment. To stay informed of our latest research into ministry formation and flourishing, sign up to get our monthly Serve Well newsletter directly to your inbox.